Incite Redux: Day 9 - Get the jumper cables for DLP
Good Morning:
At this point, I'm probably chewing my arm off - ready to head back
home and get back to my daily routine. I've come to embrace the fact
that even if I didn't have to work - I still would. The life of leisure
just isn't for me. I'm not the type to want to play golf every day or
sit at the pool or out by the beach.
It's not that I don't appreciate the ability to turn things off and just relax a bit. It's important. But it's not something I want to or could do for months at a time. I'm a builder. I like to create new things and creating a lower golf handicap is not really what I'm talking about. As I mentioned on Monday of this week. It's not something I feel bad about either.
So over the next two days, I'll be ramping back up to jump into my routine. By Monday, we'll be back at the home base. The kids will be gearing up for another couple weeks at camp, and I'll be back to being pulled in 15 directions. And I can't wait.
Yes, vacation is great. But if you aren't looking forward to getting back to your life, then you need to change your life. Have a great day.
Incite #9: Get the Jumper
Cables for DLP
Data leak
prevention stalls in
2008, continuing to be a solution looking for a problem. Given its
complexity, limited ability to protect intellectual property, and early
consolidation by Big Security, the technology is stuck in the early
adopter phase. Significant regulatory catalysts are balanced by an
uncertain spending environment, which forces users to utilize the
built-in filtering within email and web gateways. These solutions are
largely good enough to make sure a dimwit doesn’t send a SSN#
(or
other regular expression) outside of the organization.
Read the original Days
of Incite post on this topic.
6-month grade: C+
I hate waffling, but ultimately I have no choice but to waffle a bit on
this Incite. Clearly I don't think the DLP market is going great guns,
and I constantly hear anecdotes about big DLP projects being pushed out
or pilots kind of stuck in pilot mode. Yet, on the other hand, I also
hear anecdotes about some of the acquired DLP vendors beating their
internal projections, mostly driven by the reach of the acquiring
company. I guess the truth is kind of in the middle and very hard to
really calibrate.
That's why I hate making
market size projections. I guess I'll take a mental note to remember
that next year, when I'm preparing the 2009 Incites.
But let's get back to the fundamentals of the DLP space. The reality
is, as this business and the product offerings mature, the problems is
less about catching bad stuff at the gateway and more about protecting
the data at rest. That's really where it's most vulnerable. I should
probably say FINDING the sensitive data at rest, since you need to
figure out where it is before you can worry about protecting it.
And that gets back to a key hallmark about DLP, is that it's more about
process than it is about a product. Sure you can buy a gateway to look
for regular expressions (like SSN#'s and account IDs) or even use some
sophisticated information fingerprinting algorithm, but unless you know
what you are trying to protect and why - then the inherent value of the
DLP will be limited.
I think that's really the concept I was trying to isolate in the
Incite, but of course it came out like a Kimbo uppercut delivered to
the jaw of the entire category. My point is that without a process to
allow data leak prevention to actually prevent anything, you need to
have an underlying process to figure out what's important, find it, and
then ultimately protect it.
And without the process, the product is a pretty (I guess I should say
a VERY) expensive way to find the low hanging fruit, and your existing
mail and web gateways can probably find the low hanging fruit.
Photo credit: "Old Jumper Cables"
by Dann
Solo



Reading your commentary, it looks as if you haven't really been talking with people that run DLP. Our software is out there doing diving catches on real data-breach events nearly every week at this point. Do you know any CISOs at F1000 enterprises that run DLP rigs? Word has spread pretty widely in that community about all the good that DLP can do.
I talk with customers and prospects about DLP nearly every day and they clearly indicate we are getting the job done.
And every prospect i talk with who has tried to use pure regex-based email gateway solutions for DLP is getting killed on accuracy. Regex algorithms are from the 1950s! MTA vendors bundled these packages into their products to try to capture DLP dollars thinking it'd be easy to take a run at a new space. I can tell you, authoritatively, that the market outcome for MTA and proxy vendors in DLP has been poor.
Kevin Rowney
Founder, Vontu Division of Symantec
Post new comment