Incite Redux - July 12, 2007
Incite Redux - July 12, 2007
Good Morning:
Day 4 of the vacation project and we're in the home stretch. It always
goes way too fast. I'll be fighting off my normal inclination to start
worrying about all the crap that has piled up when I'm gone. Hopefully
a few hundred tropical drinks will numb my worries and my senses. I may
not remember much from today's festivities, but it'll be fun.
That's the great thing about staying at a nice tropical resort. You
head down to the pool and you stumble back to your room. Maybe I'll
even be good and work out a bit. No driving, no worries. Ain't vacation
grand?
Well, I better get back to it. The next two days will fly and then
it'll be back in the tin can on our way to rejoin civilization. Can't
say I'll be happy to be back, though I'm sure by now I miss the kids
terribly and I'm yearning to return to a "normal" schedule. No wonder
addicts have such a hard time kicking the habit. I guess we always want
to get back to what we consider "normal," regardless of how
dysfunctional it is.
Have a great day.
Incite #7: The Information
Strikes Back
2007 finally
brings acknowledgment
that data/information security is different than protecting the network
and servers. Yet, there is a major skills shortage in folks that
understand how to protect applications and databases, resulting in
accelerating interest in application and database security product
offerings. But history will repeat itself, as a “fool with a
tool” is still a fool, which doesn’t help customers
solve
any problems.
Read the original Days
of Incite post on this topic.
6-month grade: B-
Lots of folks continue to talk about “application
security,” but not enough are buying it. Why? Headwind
continues
to be largely organizationally driven. The developers just
aren’t
on board yet and the DBAs would rather stick a pencil in their eyes,
then let some security wonk put a box in front of their treasured
database. Especially when any kind of performance hit reflects really
poorly on them.
Cynical? Of course, you’d expect anything else from me?
The good news is the acquisitions of both Watchfire (by IBM) and SPI
Dynamics (by HP) will provide a lot of visibility for more secure
development activity. But getting developers to change their behaviors
is still a long long long long term project. Even if IBM and HP tells
them to do it.
Changing gears to the database security market, things continue to pick
up steam in this space. You are seeing new companies emerge, marketing
hijinx and fierce competition. This is good news for large enterprise
accounts, as the technology is maturing rapidly and is pretty much
usable for what they need. The problem is in the mid-market, where
these enterprise-oriented solutions are not ready for that segment.
There is a big opportunity for someone to simplify the DB security
market and make it both cost and time efficient for mid-market
companies to adopt.
Finally, the Web Application Firewall market is nowhere to be found. Of
course, most organizations seem to understand that your first
generation network firewall didn’t do a hell of a lot to stop
application oriented attacks, but that doesn’t matter because
the
vendors say they do it now. They call it “Deep Packet
Inspection” or something like that.
News flash! The vendors are manipulating the truth. Sure they can now
inspect all layers of the protocol stack. But that doesn’t
mean
they understand about application traffic and can block these attacks.
But there is no upside for the network security vendors to tell the
truth. Customers aren’t clamoring for web application
firewalls,
so there is no urgency for Big Security to deliver them.
Candidly, I was a bit early on this Incite. I have no doubt that in the
coming years; there will be a lot of focus on data-centric security
– but not in 2007. CSOs are still too busy bailing the water
out
of the leaky boat to start actually patching the holes.
Incite #8: Identity Everywhere
Identity
becomes the most overused
term in 2007, as NAC vendors, systems management vendors, Big Security,
and everyone else “identity-enable” their offerings
more as
a marketing initiative than to add value. Pragmatic CSOs focus on
solving problems, embracing non-disruptive mutual authentication and
integrating directory stores with network equipment to streamline
management and problem isolation. The first inklings of an
interoperable “identity network” emerge, making
cheap
multi-use tokens more compelling to a broader market.
Read the original Days
of Incite post on this topic.
6-month grade: B+
You want to talk about a capability that became table stakes within a
few months? Let’s talk about
“identity-aware” network
devices. Whether it’s IP to ID services to facilitate the
tracking of me as opposed to my arbitrary IP address, or loading
policies out of data in an LDAP or Active Directory environment
–
it’s all the same. Everyone does it. Or says they do anyway.
The identity management folks (IBM Tivoli, Oracle, CA, etc.) worked
overtime in Q1 to do Barney press releases with pretty much every NAC
and network security vendor. Big whoop, has that helped anyone do
anything? Not really.
There is also a lot less hype and excitement about authentication now
that we are 6 months past the FFIEC mandate. The folks that are going
to get compliant already bought stuff. Everyone else is going to take
their chances. That doesn’t mean the authentication market
isn’t growing, it’s just not that newsworthy
anymore.
Why a B+? Basically that last statement pretty much hasn’t
happened. Seemingly the only thing the VeriSign Identity Protection
Network has done is forced a new identity for Stratton Sclavos -
deposed CEO. This whole Identity 2.0 thing is moving forward at a
snail’s pace. Most folks wouldn’t know an InfoCard
if it
came up and blew their nose. And OpenID is a great option for the
handful of users across the 10 web sites that actually use it.
Will it get better? Of course it will. PayPal now offers tokens to
tighten authentication. Fingerprint readers are showing up on high-end
laptops and at some point they’ll figure out what to do with
the
TPM module that is in a majority of devices out there. But for the time
being, we are stuck in identity-aware purgatory. I probably know who
you are, but I’m powerless to do anything about it.




Regarding firewalls and packet inspection:
Part of why the current firewalls stink at doing anything with layer 7 data is they were all designed to work up to L4 and anything else is a bolt on feature. "Back in the day" real L7 proxy based firewalls existed. Gauntlet was designed to do protocol enforcement and allow the firewall admin to inspect for and drop packets which were within protocol spec but contained unwanted data. Sidewinder had similar features. Checkpoint killed off all the proxy based firewalls based on their speed, but they never managed to get proxy technology integrated very well. What people now call "web application firewalls" all really trace back to the old TIS fwtk web-plug module. We've had the tools to deal with these problems since the earliest days of the commercial Internet, we just choose not to use them.