The Daily Incite - February 7, 2008
February 7, 2008 - Volume 3, #12
Good Morning:
As you get involved in the day to day grind of life, sometimes it's
hard to appreciate where we've been and where we are going. A good
friend of ours
recently had his first child. He's in his 40s and he waited a long time
to find the right partner and for the timing to work out. I don't think
I ever saw a happier Dad in the pictures sent around. Yet over time,
that happiness and sheer joy fades into a morass of deadlines, bills,
and responsibilities.
Over 4 years removed from our own little miracle with the twins,
sometimes it's hard to remember when they were that little. Yet, it's
also hard to appreciate how quickly they are growing up. I seems like
yesterday that we were in the hospital and loading up our two infant
seats and starting the adventure of parents with twins. On the other
hand, it seems so long ago that it's hard to remember a time without
three kids running around the house. That memory is a funny thing.
Yes, there is a
point to my nostalgia. Last weekend, I took Leah to our first
Father/Daughter dance. We got all dressed up, but only after a couple
of attempts. Evidently my first try, a nice sweater and khakis wasn't
good enough. So the "little Boss" sent me back to try again. Like
mother, like daughter. She wanted me to wear a tie, but that wasn't
going to happen. The dress shirt and blazer was a good compromise. It's
never too early to teach your kids to negotiate.
Then we went out to a nice dinner. It was a special night, so I didn't
give Leah a hard time about only eating French Fries. Normally we force
her to eat something else, but not tonight. We looked too fancy to
argue.
Then it was off to the dance. Leah started off a bit bashful and wanted
to watch for a dance or two. But once she got going, it was great.
She's a pretty good dancer and got that from the Big Boss. Me? Not so
much. But even I can do the Macarena, Hokey Pokey and
Chicken Dance. Boy, I must really love that girl for me to do the
Macarena in public. After a few dances, I had lost track of her. She
found her way into a pack of girls dancing to the Cha-Cha Slide. That
was OK by me because she was having fun.
It was a great time and I'm sure I'll have lots of experiences like
that through the years with my girls. There is always something special
about the first dance with the oldest daughter. It's hard to have the
discipline to remember these times, when you are stuck in the quicksand
of daily existence. But it's important because it's too easy to forget.
Thankfully I have an outlet, so I can write about this stuff a couple
of times a week. Maybe someday I'll even go back and read some of these
posts. That's the plan anyway. Thanks for listening. Who knew that
signing up for a security newsletter would make you into a shrink? The
check is in the mail.
Have a great weekend.
"Daddy Daughter Dance..." picture
originally uploaded by Jamie Fender
Technorati: Information
Security, CSO,
Security
Mike, Internet
Security
![]() The Pragmatic CSO: Available Now! Read the Intro and Get "5 Tips to be a Better CSO" www.pragmaticcso.com |
Get Your Special Report: 6 Easy Steps to Protect Your Identity and get access to Security Mike's Portal today www.securitymike.com ![]() |
Top Security News
What
does a mandate mean anyway?
So what? -
It's been definitively shown that deploying a secure configuration on
computing devices helps to protect them. You know, turning off services
you don't need and eliminating a lot of the options that enable users
(and servers for that matter) to get hurt. Unfortunately a lot of
organizations don't employ a standard build, a mandatory configuration
or any of these other tactics. So they have hundreds or thousands of
lone devices out there waiting to get hammered. The US Feds have gotten
religion and have now mandated the Federal Desktop Core Configuration
(FDCC). NIST has responded by figuring out an
acceptable configuration and certifying a bunch of
configuration tools to enforce that configuration. By the way, this is
not new. The Center for Internet Security has been offing configuration
guides for years. And amazingly enough, they actually work. But only if
you use them. So Larry Seltzer is right in point out that
FDCC is a good thing, but it's going to be a bear to get all
of the wild west (our computing environments) on board anytime soon.
Link to this
Now you need to search yourself
So what? -
I use Google Search maybe 50 times a day, and a bunch more on my
Blackberry. It's a lot easier to do a mobile search to find what I need
than to try to manually type in a URL into the lame BB browser. But
what can be used for good stuff, is also used for bad stuff. A couple
of months back, a bunch of misconfigured Citrix servers were discovered
by looking for a pretty standard configuration file in Google, and
there are lots of other nasty things you can do via the Googleplex. SearchSecurityChannel has a piece by Johnny
Long (excerpted from his book) that goes through 10 searches
that can yield some very interesting results. Tom Bowers also did a video of some
additional simple Google hacking techniques, like Google
Alerts and the cache. So here is the money shot: Are you Google hacking
yourself? If not, you should be. Remember, we don't like surprises and
if you aren't using the same techniques the bad folks are using, then
you will inevitably be surprised. No question about it.
Link to this
Products and services continue to
blur
So what? -
With the advent on software as a service (SaaS) offerings, it's really
hard to figure out what is a product and what is a service moving
forward. The reality is that a lot of vendors will try packaging their
stuff as a service for a couple of reasons. The first is because they
are having trouble finding an enterprise market for their stuff.
Packaging as a "lease to own" type of thing will help reduce the cost
and thus the risk to enterprise buyers. Or a lot of companies also do a
standard consulting engagement to highlight the benefits of their
tools, with the idea that once the customer sees all the tool can do
via the consulting project - they'll absolutely need to buy it. Tizor's recent announcement of a content
discovery service would seem to fit into the latter bucket.
Regardless of how they got there (and they are not unique in offering a
service to discover content), for those of you worried about leaking
intellectual property - this kind of thing is important. How do you
know what is leaking, if you don't even know what you are supposed to
be protecting? That's why it's so important to build relationships with
business leaders. You don't know what needs to be protected, but they
do. And the only way to figure that out is to ask them.
Link to this
The Laundry List
- In this month's ebizQ feature, I tackle why the secure software development life cycle (SDLC) is important and how to get there. - The Mike Rothman Security Report
- Secure Computing announced Q4, which was light on the revenue line. Given all the other security vendors are announcing blowout Q4 results (but cautious on the 2008 outlook), this doesn't bode well. - Secure Computing earnings release
- Check Point joins the bundling crowd, finally integrating PointSec into their new Endpoint Security offering. Original name there too. - SearchSecurity coverage
- Speed is in the eye of the beholder. Shimmy rants a bit about IPS throughput stats and he makes a good point. The vendors will lie about performance, verify their findings. - Shimmy's blog
Top Blog Postings
Test
yourself to fight boredom
Bejtlich covers the recent news about TSA testing techniques and makes
a number of great points. I'm a big fan of security assurance, and that
means testing your defenses - using the tactics the bad guys use. It
seems the TSA is a fan of that too and they test on the order of 70,000
threat images every day. Why? The first reason is training. When
someone screws up, they can use relevant and REAL context to make sure
it doesn't happen again. Second is to keep these folks on their toes.
Watching thousands of bags go by will make anyone numb. But knowing
that there will be tests and that you will be held accountable
certainly helps to keep folks engaged and paying attention. I know some
folks think there are ethical issues with running these kinds of tests.
I think those folks are wrong. The bad guys don't follow any rules, so
why would we?
http://taosecurity.blogspot.com/2008/01/tsa-lessons-for-security-analysts.html
Link
to this
How do you prove security?
Interesting post over at the ModSecurity blog about proving the
security of a web site. A couple of interesting points here, the first
being that just saying "yes!" and praying is not really an answer. You
probably chuckled, but a lot of folks do just that. They don't have a
plan, they just react to whatever is thrown at their heads today and
they hope for the best. Hope is not a strategy. Second, tools are OK -
but not necessarily sufficient. Then there is a nugget here that sounds
vaguely familiar relative to using PCI to "prove" security: "It is much easier to pass a PCI
audit if you are secure than to be secure because you pass a PCI audit."
Right. Then it builds to the real answer, which is to track usage
patterns (monitoring) and collecting log data to be able to piece
together issues, when they arise. Finally, it closes with the idea that
you need to test your people and processes to ensure you can respond
when something goes down. Amen to that.
http://www.modsecurity.org/blog/archives/2008/01/is_your_website.html
Link
to this
Security is a business function,
REMEMBER?!?!?!
Hoff rants a bit about security vs. availability here. He's absolutely
right. The first Pragmatic CSO "Reason to Secure" is to maintain
business system availability. That doesn't say or even intimate that
security is part of the plan. Sometimes security and availability are
at odds with each other. You need to make the decision that's right for
the business, even if it means taking on risk at times. Even a data
leak or a corporate liability
situation is minor, if you can't take orders or ship products. That's
what so many security professionals don't get. Decisions about how much
to invest or what to do need to be made within the CONTEXT of the
business. It's not about you or a personal indictment of your abilities
if you don't get something funded. It's all about resource allocation
and someone has decided that they needed to allocate those resources
elsewhere. Don't take it personally, but do learn from it. What didn't
you do to make the case as to why your project was important? Was is
really that important after all? There are a billion ways our
organizations can be pwned. You can't stop them all, so you need to
focus based upon what is most important to your business.
http://rationalsecurity.typepad.com/blog/2008/02/omg-availabilit.html
Link
to this
Recently
on the Security Incite's Blogs
Find out what Security
Mike is talking about
http://sm-blog.securitymike.com
Check out the
latest on
the Security Incite blog
http://blog.securityincite.com/
Read the
most recent Daily
Incite
http://securityincite.com/security-incite-rants/daily-incite



Recent comments
3 days 7 hours ago
5 days 1 hour ago
1 week 20 hours ago
1 week 2 days ago
2 weeks 1 day ago
2 weeks 2 days ago
2 weeks 3 days ago
2 weeks 5 days ago
2 weeks 5 days ago
2 weeks 5 days ago