The Daily Incite - October 24, 2007
October 24, 2007 - Volume 2, #146
Good Morning:
It's one of those days, already. I've become an early riser, like 5 AM
early. I like to have a little time before the mayhem of my day starts
to contemplate world domination, get through the crap that accumulated
as I was sleeping, and do my initial pass through my reading list. Then
I get my oldest ready for school, put her on the bus and start
cranking on TDI.
That's a typical day, but I knew at about 4:45 AM that this day wasn't
going to be typical. I was right. All 3 of the kids were up and dressed
at 5 AM. I'm not sure what got into their Wheaties, but they were up
and ready to go. I wasn't and neither was the Boss. Evidently there are
only so many books and Barbies that the kids will play with when I'm
trying to keep to my morning ritual.
I saw it in their eyes. Ritual - smitual. They wanted no part of that.
I kept hearing "get me some breakfast" and the typical sibling
bickering that goes along with little people living in your house. It's
hard to contemplate world domination when the kids want more Corn
Pops.
I guess there are days when the rituals just won't work. I'm working on
going with the flow better, but it's still a struggle. If I don't take
that time first thing in the morning, the day gets off to the wrong
start and usually snowballs from there. It takes a lot of thought and
planning to dominate the world, I
just wish my kids could appreciate that. I hope someday they will
- if I do my job right.
On another topic, it seems that Dogbert has figured out where the real
money is. It's in being a "security consultant." Check out Dilbert on Saturday and Dilbert on Monday to get a feel
for the broad perception of security. I like the part about beating the
intruder with a trash can. That sounds like fun. I do think that (for
once) Scott Adams missed the boat on these posts. Since Dogbert is the
entrepreneurial type, he should be a PCI auditor. That's where the
money is.
Have a great day.
Technorati: Information
Security, CSO,
Security
Mike, Internet
Security
![]() The Pragmatic CSO: Available Now! Read the Intro and Get "5 Tips to be a Better CSO" www.pragmaticcso.com |
Get Your Special Report: 6 Easy Steps to Protect Your Identity and pre-order your copy today www.securitymike.com ![]() |
Top Security News
There
is no line between home and business
So what? -
In Andreas' NetworkWorld column (tip to you buddy, don't make fun of
any of NWW's feature stories - if you like your column anyway), he talks about separating work and play
- at least from the perspective of computing power. The reality is that
there is very little separation nowadays. I don't really know anyone
that truly leaves the office. Whether it's the Crackberry or the late
nights or the travel, most of my cronies are tied to their job in one
way or another. That being said, I do think Andreas makes an important
point, which is the criticality of keeping home and business COMPUTING
separate. The idea of running a "home" virtual machine on your work
device makes sense. But it does add cost and complexity to the
equation. I don't think making a virtual machine work is practical for
Joe White Collar. The idea of a thumb drive virtual machine is also
interesting and more likely to work. I know a lot of folks use GoToMyPC
on their home device to get to their files and do stuff. I'm a big
believer in Mr. Market and when there is a need, the market will figure
out how to fulfill it. Start looking at the personal stuff that people
do on their work devices and making a public example of it, and I
suspect the need will become a lot more apparent.
Link to this
More
layers peel off the TJX onion and it's stinky
So what? -
Evidently 45 million identities stolen in the TJX data breach was a bit
on the short side. According to Visa and MasterCard anyway. Covered on Evan Schuman's StorefrontBacktalk blog
(say that 10 times fast), it seems that 29 million MasterCards and 65
million Visas were pilfered. That's 94 MILLION identities folks.
Actually, the most surprising thing is the sheer volume. I mean TJX is
a huge company. 94 million customers (or at least that many unique
credit cards used in their stores) is a big number. I'm not surprised
that the story keeps getting worse, since TJX had no idea what was
going on for 3 years, what gives you any confidence that their
estimates of loss are going to have any precision? On the bright side,
Visa's fraud control seems relatively effective in that losses
are now estimated at the high end to be $83 million. $83MM is a
significant loss, but given the number of stolen card numbers out
there,
you'd think it would be more than that.
Link to this
The Feds embrace whole disk
So what? -
And who says the US Federal Government doesn't learn from their
mistakes? It only took a handful of stolen laptops to draw the
spotlight on the fact that whole disk encryption is probably a good
idea for mobile devices. GCN has a series of articles discussing the
topic. It's such a good idea that Check Point bought PointSec
and McAfee is buying SafeBoot. Of course, disk encryption doesn't
really stand alone and it's built into Vista and Mac OS X. Maybe not as
manageable as these 3rd party options, but nonetheless it's there. This
looks to be another example of a market that will take money from other
"less urgent" needs, like SIEM, NAC and DLP. This will have an impact
on 2008 budgets, but by 2009 expect to see whole disk encryption as a
feature of a new "mobile device" security suite. That's right, you
heard it here first. You should see the AV vendors start to segment
their offerings into a desktop and mobile bundles. The mobile offering
adds things like WiFi security, more sophisticated endpoint
application control and whole disk encryption. AV vendors, let me know
where to send the product management consulting invoices.
Link to this
The Laundry List
- Entrust announces Q3 results. Back to profitability (in a non-GAAP way), but product revenue was light. Welcome to the world of the living dead, which is amazing given the continued interest in authentication technologies. - Entrust release
- Talk about a feature, not a company. Start-up Abaca Technology announces a "reputation" gateway to block spam. This one is based on "receiver's reputation," which sounds like the same crap to me. - NetworkWorld coverage
- The 2007 version of the $200 toilet seat. Why not have a firewall running in a tank? I guess you can't run a VPN client in an M1A. - St.Bernard release
- Great, now I get to authenticate to my printer. I hope they have self-service password reset on my new OfficeJet. Like I said, security is really a feature of everything, even printing. - InfoWorld coverage
Top Blog Postings
Are
we out of control?
That's the question that Gunnar asks in this post. Are security folks
so enamored with the latest widget or minor attack vector or nebulous
technology that we are missing the forest for the trees? Absolutely.
This in a nutshell is why I think the Pragmatic
CSO is so important.
And it's not just that I have a garage full of inventory that I'm
trying to move. HA! Actually, the point Gunnar makes is a very good
one. Some other IT disciplines (like app development) are all about the
business by definition. If you are implementing SAP, you need to know
how the business operates and should operate because that's what you
are automating. It's a bit less clear in the case of security, but it's
no less important. If we can't relate security functions to business
value, we will always be relegated to the sidelines waiting for our
staff and budget to get cut. I'm not saying the P-CSO process will work
for every one or that it's perfect, but if you are struggling with
explaining why you do things to management, then you owe it to yourself
to at least read the Introduction.
http://1raindrop.typepad.com/1_raindrop/2007/10/it-security---a.html
Link
to this
I dub you Darth Stiennon
Evidently there is none of the good left in Stiennon. He has fully
moved to the dark side. Now he just needs to slaughter a bunch of Jedi
students to make his transition complete. First of all, I should have
gone to ITExpo if
only to see Stiennon doing booth duty. But this idea of actually
blaming the customer for a bunch of price inflated security widgets is
a beauty. I guess the answer is to just add a firewall everywhere
(between network segments and agencies anyway) and the problems
miraculously dissipate. When you sell a hammer, everything looks like a
nail, no? The fact is both the users and vendors are to blame for the
quicksand we are now in. Users haven't enforced policies or related
security to the business. But the vendors have been more than happy to
sell more widgets that solve increasingly narrow problems. The customer
who raises Stiennon ire actually had the gall to say what I've heard
from a bunch of CEOs and CFOs - that they've spent a TON of
money on devices and still don't feel secure.
http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/?p=483
Link
to this
IPS = PCI, not so much
Rob Newby relates a very interesting story about a large retailer
getting advice from its QSA to implement IPS in every location. Huh?
Unless they connect every location directly to the Internet and take
inbound traffic, what the
hell is that going to do - besides make some IPS sales guy very very
very happy? But this underscores a much bigger point, which is the
subjectivity and variability that you'll get in PCI auditor
recommendation. There is no generic security posture that will pass the
audit and each auditor brings his/her own biases to the table relative
to what "PCI compliance" really means. That's why it's so
dangerous to just focus on PCI or any other regulation for that matter.
Focus on building and maintaining a STRONG SECURITY POSTURE and these
regulations will fall into place. There is nothing in PCI that is so
outrageous. In fact, you should have been meeting most of the
requirements already. Now you just have to document it.
http://robnewby.blogspot.com/2007/10/pci-project-blues.html
Link
to this
Recently
on the Security Incite's Blogs
Find out what Security
Mike is talking about
http://securitymike.blogspot.com
Check out the
latest on
the Security Incite blog
http://blog.securityincite.com/
Read the
most recent Daily
Incite
http://securityincite.com/security-incite-rants/daily-incite



Mike, my son, you of all people know that vendors do not a market make. You can invent a really cool slick security widget but there has to be market demand for it. If not, the company shrivels up and dies. Yes, there are a plethora of vendors, but that is because the problem is changing so fast. Those that claim it is evil marketing people that are the problem are implying that customers are dupes, buying products based on airport ads instead of functions/features/and company viability.
I think you will find that I have *always* been a supporter of vendors over analysts. If that is the dark side then that is were I have always resided. Of course I have been known to call out certain vendors for lack of vision and products that are not keeping up. But, with the dozens of security folks at large eneterprises and government that put products through the wringer you cannot blame the widgets for lack of controls, authentication and secure methodologies that exist at many organizations.
I appreciate how you and other bloggers could have taken my particular frustration with the US Military as a more general statement but actually, I find many organizations do do security well.
-Stiennon