Understanding the Opportunity Cost of a Deal Gone Bad

Submitted by Mike Rothman on Fri, 2006-04-07 11:28.

As a bit of a follow-up to the my previous post on "Are Acquisitions Good for Customers?" I got to thinking about the opportunity cost of when a deal goes bad. As we all know, the security business moves incredibly fast. 6 months is a lifetime, so when deals like Check Point/Sourcefire or SafeNet/nCipher goes south - what is the impact?

I believe the impact of these situations is significant. First, there are integration activities. Big companies (like when AT&T Wireless and Cingular merged) have integration teams that work in clean rooms. They are literally totally separated from both organizations and have no communication with either entity until the deal closes. So when the final approvals are gained, both companies sprint into action implementing the plans concocted by the integration teams.

But most things that we see in the security business are not like that. What happens is that the teams start working informally together as the paperwork and formality around the deal is completed. They start considering roadmaps and customer communications and support integration and about a million other things. All of this considering takes a lot of time. That's time not being spent pushing the product forward. So when the deal goes south, all that work goes up in smoke. Poof. And time is wasted, which means opportunity cost.

Sales people are paid on what they sell, so it's pretty unusual for them to take their foot off the gas - unless they were big shareholders. So it's pretty rare to see a company just totally blow a quarter after a deal is announced. But marketing is usually problematic when you are in limbo. You can't commit big resources to long, strategic marketing programs, so you tend to do nothing. At that point, no one is really paying attention to marketing anyway.

But then the fateful day happens, and the deal is called off. First, there is shock and surprise. I'm sure some rumblings have been happening on the grapevine, but still. There is something very final about a press release being sent out that the deal is off. So you spend the next two weeks recalibrating. You must communicate aggressively with existing customers. Better take a look at that pipeline again and this time much more closely. Get your spinmeisters to figure out how you message the deal's demise is a big positive. You must go back and revisit exactly where that next product upgrade is in the process. How much has it slipped? Is is the right stuff to be building right now?

In general, chaos ensues. And chaos costs time and money. So I feel for the folks at Check Point, SafeNet and nCipher. They need to face the reality of going it alone and they've wasted a tremendous amount of time and money in a very competitive market space. That cost cannot be recouped.

Of course, it is rare when you have a situation like Sourcefire - who I believe got great benefit from the deal falling apart. Time will tell on that one.

 

Submitted by Stiennon (not verified) on Fri, 2006-04-07 14:34.
When I was at PricewaterhouseCoopers I got to see high paid advisors guide their clients in deal making. They inevitably killed the deals. After a while I figured it out. The consultant got paid regardless but if they were in favor of a deal and it did not work out they would get the blame. Since, historically, most acquisitions do not work out it is probably a good thing when deals get broken off. I agree completely though that the broken deal situation is very expensive. That's good reason for executives to avoid going down that path unless they have done their homework. Stiennon
Submitted by Mike Rothman on Fri, 2006-04-07 14:41.
This is a great comment and clearly overlooked by yours truly. My bad. M&A is not a cheap hobby, deals are expensive in the best case and can bring down a company in the worst. The thing with both Check Point/Sourcefire and SafeNet/nCipher is that they weren't bad deals. I know Stiennon didn't like the Check Point deal, but we differ on that. But now both are broken and all parties are paying significant opportunity cost.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.