October 30, 2007 - Volume 2, #148
Good Morning:
I had better keep working on my karma because I don't want to spend any
time in purgatory when I'm done here. Purgatory scares the hell out of
me (no pun intended). You see I have a package of books in Customs
purgatory North of the Border (which is Canada for you non-US folks)
and
it's not a pleasant place to be. Especially when you are trying to take
a few days off for family time.
Now I'm not one to give props easily. In fact, I hate most things.
Attaboys from me should be put into a little card sleeve and stored to
sell at a baseball card convention in about 15 years. It could be as
valuable as a Clemens rookie card. Or at least a friggin' Hazelnut
Latte (non-fat, of course). But after dealing with FedEx on this little
customs issue, the US Postal Service seems like the second coming.
You see I ship a bunch of books to international locations. The
Internet truly provides unbelivable global reach. I dutifully
fill out the packing slips and print out the international mailing
label, which I
generate from the USPS web site. I attach the mailing label to the
package, drop it off at the post office and go on my merry way. I
figured dealing with FedEx was similar. Not so much. I found out I
needed to specifically name FedEx as my "broker" to clear customs. That
means I need to fill out a form. Of course, the FedEx folks didn't tell
me about that form when I dropped off the package. Evidently I'm
supposed to just "know" that.
OK, no big deal. I get the form faxed to me and it seems I need a
"Canadian Business Number." What is that and how to I get it? It seems
no one knows. So I go around and around with FedEx and a host of
Canadian agencies until finally I'm directed
to the right group that can issue my business number. Of course, only
after I fax them a bunch of stuff, including proof of my company's
incorporation. Thankfully, I keep everything accessible on either my
MacBook or my PC (which is accessible remotely). So I run down to
Kinkos, print out the papers and fax the forms.
I do have to say the folks that issued my business number were great.
We played phone tag a bit, but they kept trying and we finally got it
done - within 4 business hours of my request. Unfortunately my
experience with Customs was closer to burning hell fire than anything
else. It seems that faxing the proper forms to customs TWICE wasn't
enough. When I called this morning to see what the hell was going on
with my package, they said they couldn't find the fax. Let's just say I
was less than ecstatic, but I kept my cool because bureaucrats and
$10/hr call center reps don't take to spit and venom very well.
I did get a call maybe 2 hours later saying the found my fax and now
they are just waiting for Customs to approve the form, so then the
package could be cleared and my package can finally be delivered.
And to think, I paid about triple the price to get the two day FedEx
service last Tuesday to absolutely positively get the package there by
last Friday. I could have used the trusty old USPS, gotten the package
there today and not had to figure out where the random fax machines
were during family time. Thankfully the Boss and the rest of
my family are very understanding as I spent time on the phone and
peeled
off to find Kinkos in the middle of the night.
Argggh. Hopefully the package will get out of purgatory today and get
back on it's journey. Have a great day.
Technorati: Information
Security [1], CSO [2],
Security
Mike [3], Internet
Security [4]
[5]The Pragmatic CSO: Available Now! Read the Intro and Get "5 Tips to be a Better CSO" www.pragmaticcso.com [6] |
Get Your Special Report: 6 Easy Steps to Protect Your Identity and pre-order your copy today www.securitymike.com [7] [8] |
Top Security News
Trend Micro acquiring Provilla [9]
and this deal makes a lot of sense. Provilla was pretty small, but had
a bunch of OEM partners (including BigFix and Reconnex) that needed a
desktop agent for DLP. Though I do think that Trend is still missing
some of the true "endpoint" policy management capabilities (like
enforcing an
endpoint connection policy, etc.) that will be required as endpoint
security becomes truly integrated over the next 18 months. That's
right, one agent on the desktop to do everything security that you
need. Interestingly enough, the DLP market has segmented into desktop
stuff (like Provilla and Onigma/McAfee) and gateway/enterprise. The
gateway/enterprise folks claim to have robust endpoint agents, but at
the end
of the day - it's more about integration with the stuff that's already
on the desktop. Who the hell wants yet another agent on the desktop to
manage? So seeing a Vontu or Vericept integrate with McAfee or
Trend's desktop agent would be a good thing for customers. But since
everyone still thinks they can "lead" this market - it probably won't
happen, but it should. Finally, there aren't a lot of companies left
that focus on the desktop side of DLP, if any. That means some other
endpoint security vendors are going to be left out in the cold and need
to build it themselves, which doesn't help time to market.
Link to this [9]
a new set
of initiatives (called PABT -
Payment Application Best Practices) that indicate how card holder data
should be handled by the payment applications [10]. This will have
a serious impact on all of the payment software vendors and all of the
small merchants who utilize these shopping carts because they don't
have the resources to do it themselves. Like me. If the systems cannot
store card numbers AT ALL, then how do you do a recurring payment
subscription service? Does that kill my one-click capability at Amazon
or any other online merchant where I keep a credit card on file (which
is about two)? Obviously there are things that need to be clarified
relative to PABT and in general, I think defining how the data can/must
be handled is a good thing. But Visa needs to be careful that they
don't end up legislating the destruction of markets.
Link to this [10]
As
Mich Kabay details in his NetworkWorld column - DON'T LIE [11].
Basically, you need to come clean as early as you can. Get HR involved.
Get Legal involved. Make sure the liability of your organization is
limited and controlled. Figure out when and if law enforcement needs to
be involved. By the way, all of this needs to be documented and
structured AHEAD of the breach. For those of you who haven't read the
Pragmatic CSO yet, I have an entire step about incident response and
damage containment. This piece provides some of the main ideas, but
none of the detail. Hint, hint.
Link to this [11]
The Laundry List
- Shareholder activists targeting Websense. Yes, everything is a feature and web filtering is too, so Websense should be finding a bigger, more established partner. Activist shareholders have a way of making that happen. - Seeking Alpha coverage [12]
- SHOCKER! Tumbleweed misses Wall Street estimates (again). Light revenue and slipping competitive position doesn't bode well. The good news for TMWD shareholders is that it can only go to zero. - Tumbleweed earnings release [13]
- More earnings weakness from Secure Computing. The release tries to paint a nice picture of a "record" quarter, but both revenues and earnings were below expectations and Q4 guidance was also light. Wall Street isn't fooled, stock is down over 10% in after hours trading. - Secure Computing earnings release [14]
- Yet another on the "miss" parade. VASCO is light on both the top and bottom lines, relative to expectations. Was trading at 40, now it's at 25. Got to love those haircuts. - VASCO earnings release [15]
- Finally, a smaller public security company that made their numbers. SonicWALL hits the numbers and Q4 guidance. - SonicWALL earnings release [16]
Top Blog Postings
http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=618 [17]
Link
to this [17]
http://jeremiahgrossman.blogspot.com/2007/10/why-crawling-matters.html [18]
Link
to this [18]
http://www.cigital.com/justiceleague/2007/10/26/the-risk-of-too-much-risk-management/ [19]
Link
to this [19]
http://securitymike.blogspot.com [20]
Check out the
latest on
the Security Incite blog
http://blog.securityincite.com/ [21]
Read the
most recent Daily
Incite
http://securityincite.com/security-incite-rants/daily-incite [21]
[5]
[8]