November 9, 2007 - Volume 2, #152
Good Morning:
Happy Friday. Yes, it's an uncharacteristic Friday Incite, but perhaps
you didn't notice I missed yesterday. After a quick jaunt across the
country and back for speaking gigs and meetings, I was a bit run down
and felt sea sick. But that may have been from watching my portfolio
dip over the past few days. Yes, the old US stock market has been a bit
tumultuous, as Cisco's 17% top line growth sent the market into a tail
spin. Of course, it's not that simple, but Cisco's outlook on tech
spending and failure to appropriately manage expectations relative to
growth last quarter gave most of big technology a hair cut yesterday.
Those of you who have ridden Google, VMWare and Apple the past few
months were feeling some pain.
But not me. Well not exactly. I actually have no idea what specific
stocks I own. I, like millions of others, have outsourced stock
picking in lieu of mutual funds. And no, that doesn't mean that I let
some faceless guy in a
suit with a headset on "advise me." I run 4 self-directed portfolios
that have consistently beaten the markets for the past 5 years. Not to
pat myself on the back (OK, maybe a little), I do this in a total of
about one hour a month. Take that, 4-hour workweek guy.
Stocks rise, stocks fall and I go about my business, but it wasn't
always like that. I remember back in the Internet bubble, I was one of
those guys that had a Palm Vx with the sled modem so I could get email
and make stock trades when I needed to. I had multiple back-up methods
to ensure my trades got executed and subscribed to trading newsletters.
I was probably trading for 1-2 hours a DAY. I was also making a LOT of
money, but that was not unique. It seems almost every jackass that did
any trading was making a lot of money in 1998 and 1999.
But alas, gravity hit me upside the head big time in late 2000 and
2001, like everyone else. I learned all sorts
of key lessons on stocks like USi and Microstrategy. Something trying
not to catch a falling knife. Those lessons cost me a
fortune. So in grand
Rothman tradition, I had made and lost a fortune by the time I was 32.
Bully for me.
After beating myself up for quite a while (and still riding a huge
tax-loss carryover), I looked for a better way with less stress and
using the appropriate time frames to, in the immortal words of Peter
Lynch, "get rich slowly." At the time, I was in my early 30s and
finally figured out that life is a marathon and not a sprint. So I
looked for an investment philosophy that played into that.
I'm also a quant guy and a systems guy. I look for better systems to
accomplish a job. So a systems-based approach was something I was very
interested in. Something that told me when and what to buy and when to
sell it. I wanted to take emotion out of the equation. I had followed
the mechanical investing boards at the Motley Fool for a while and even
played my hand at running a few of my own systems. I found I did pretty
well buying stuff, but selling - not so much.
After some more tooling around, I finally found a system that worked.
Here is my secret for all of you folks out there. It's called Fund*X (www.fundx.com [1])
and they provide a newsletter which provides detail on their mutual
fund investing system. It's based on following trends (which every
quant guy will love) and it's embarrassingly easy to follow. It's
out-performed the broad market indexes over a 30 year period, through
up and down markets. But check it out and see if it's for you. To be
clear, I'm not giving you investing advice and I'm not recommending you
do anything but go visit the site. It works for me and that's all I'm
saying here.
I've got a lot to do today and watching the stock market gyrate
isn't high on the list. Have a great weekend.
Technorati: Information
Security [2], CSO [3],
Security
Mike [4], Internet
Security [5]
[6]The Pragmatic CSO: Available Now! Read the Intro and Get "5 Tips to be a Better CSO" www.pragmaticcso.com [7] |
Get Your Special Report: 6 Easy Steps to Protect Your Identity and pre-order your copy today www.securitymike.com [8] [9] |
Top Security News
Wired does a great peace highlighting the
fact that if your mail is within someone else's service, it's in their
control [10]. To be clear, I don't think Hush is doing anything
wrong here. We have law enforcement for a reason and I'm cool with
that. Not sure if Captain Privacy groks it, but as long as it's in the
fine print of the service agreement - it's OK with me. I guess it's
back to the tried and true methods of forcing the bad guys to do the
encryption themselves
(PGP anyone?). But just remember, SaaS is a wonderful thing, but you
really are beholden to the whims of your service provider. If you
aren't cool with that, then don't use the service.
Link to this [10]
Dark Reading's Tim Wilson rants a bit about
people once again calling the accelerated rate of consolidation the
beginning of the end of the security business [11]. For the most
part I agree with Tim. Security isn't going away, per se, but I do
believe the security INDUSTRY has seen it's best days. Security really
does need to be a feature within the broader set of technology services
and I'm not sure how that really happens if we still consider the
market a stand-alone entity. I do believe that there will continue to
be innovation. There will continue to be investment. There will
continue to be consolidation. That is the natural law of things. BUT, I
also believe that security practitioners and vendors need to focus
more on how we play into the broader technology ecosystem. It's not
about us vs. them, good and evil, fire and brimstone kind of stuff
anymore. It's about how we can add value to the business or make sure
other folks don't take value away. We can't do that ourselves and thus
we shouldn't expect that our little business will stand by itself. Not
forever anyway.
Link to this [11]
The Laundry List
- Sophos to IPO. Not sure what to make of the timing, but having a currency to buy more stuff will be a good thing as the endpoint continues to integrate. - CBR coverage [12]
- Guess they don't teach marketing in the Gulag. Russian company actually calls their employee monitoring software KGB and categorizes it as spyware. Next up is their brand of cigarettes, appropriately called "cancer sticks." - NetworkWorld coverage [13]
- Who gets rich in a war? Right the guys that make the weapons. Or even one step removed, the guys that sell the lists of folks fighting to the arms dealers. Figure out how that relates to TechTarget's continued growth in the market and further consolidation in online lead farms, since they just bought Knowledgestorm too. - TTGT earnings release [14]
Top Blog Postings
http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/security/dmorrill/archives/time-for-a-more-flexible-sense-of-ethics [15]
Link
to this [15]
http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/stuart_king/2007/11/i-was-dissapointed-to-learn.html [16]
Link
to this [16]
http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=138130 [17]
Link
to this [17]
http://securitymike.blogspot.com [18]
Check out the
latest on
the Security Incite blog
http://blog.securityincite.com/ [19]
Read the
most recent Daily
Incite
http://securityincite.com/security-incite-rants/daily-incite [19]
[6]
[9]