December 14, 2007 - Volume 2, #163
Good Morning:
Although the stock market has been a bit turbulent over the past few
months, the major averages are still up nicely for 2007. Not too many
more nicely than Apple, and Google has certainly done OK too,
especially given the rapid run-up over the past two years. Both of
these companies have super-sized market caps that would make Ronald
McDonald proud. I also heard the Hamburgler is thinking about coming
out of retirement to get some of that. OK, maybe not - but I just had
to work the Hamburgler into the piece. Love the Hamburgler.
But how do these companies
maintain such astounding growth rates, given the size of their
companies? They need more customers to use more of their stuff. Brain
surgery, right? I can only look at my own purchasing and use habits,
and I know I
am consuming a lot more Apple and Google than I have in the past.
Although my Mom may like to think I'm "unique," I suspect there are a
lot of people with buying habits similar to mine.
I've got 4 Macs now (yes I bought the iMac, so I could stop using that
nightmare that is Vista), a bunch of iPods, and I'm increasingly using
Google for a lot more things. With word that Google can natively sync
with the Blackberry calendar [1], it's time to now revisit
whether I can
leave Microsoft in the rear view mirror. At least for a little while.
The reality is that I've been held captive by Microsoft Exchange's
superior integration with the Blackberry for years. I pay about $22 per
month for my hosted Exchange service, and I'm starting to scratch my
head and wonder if I'm still just married to my old corporate mentality
and whether it's time to really cut the cord. I don't use Tasks and I
don't use the Memopad often at all, so having to actually sync with my
desktop (using PocketMac [2]) probably isn't that big
of a deal.
Now I haven't used the Gmail application on the Blackberry, but I hear
it's outstanding. But the key attraction of the Blackberry has always
been push email. Do I really need instantaneous email? I probably
won't get back to you instantaneously anyway. Won't email through IMAP
to a mailbox provided by one of my 3 different hosting providers
suffice? I'm trying to restrict my email usage to a morning and evening
block anyway.
I've been waiting for Mac Office 2008 mostly for the allegedly enhanced
connectivity with Exchange. But now it seems Microsoft is backpedaling
a bit relative to how well Entourage 2008 will really stack up to
Outlook [3]. It's just ridiculous that I need to run Windows on
my
Mac mostly for Outlook. It's even more ridiculous that I'll need to
wait for better Exchange support to roll out in phases. The situation
is pretty much non-tenable at this point. In my opinion, Entourage 2004
is the worst email client I've ever used. If Entourage 2008 is only
marginally better, then it will still suck. And E 2008 still won't be
able to import Windows Outlook .pst files, so a bunch of my old mail
will still be trapped in Windows land, unless I want to use a cludgy
work-around. Arghhh.
So I guess I'm wondering about this entire Microsoft hegemony. I'll
need to get some more feedback from folks I trust, but it may be time
to give iWork '08 a try as well. It takes a few more steps to work with
the Office file formats, but it can be done. Or maybe I'll just go with
Google Apps. I wonder if the editors I work with would take a link,
instead of an attachment to the pieces I write every month? Then I can
use Google Apps to provide my mail and calendar (since it's natively
integrated with the BB now). I can also start using GDocs and the
spreadsheet program as well. When was the last time I really needed a
pivot table?
I think it's time to cut the cord. The more I think about it, the
better idea I think it is. I'll ditch my hosted Exchange Service and
try out Google Apps. I'll save about $200 and probably be a lot
happier. Even after buying iWork, I'll still be ahead $120. Maybe I can
push out the Mac Office 2008 upgrade (which will set me back $300 big
ones). By then I'll have played around with Pages and Keynote enough to
know whether I'll be able to make it work. I've heard good things about
OpenOffice as well.
Am I crazy? Will I come running back to MSFT Office with my tail
between my legs by February? Will Captain Privacy's hidden subliminal
messages finally convince me that having all my stuff with Google is a
bad thing? If anything it will be an interesting experiment.
Interesting indeed.
In terms of properly managing expectations, publishing of TDI will be
kind of lumpy through January. Between holidays and other
work commitments, my goal is to do 3 next week to finish the year and
then review the 2007 Incites during Xmas week. In January I'll be
publishing when I can, but figure at least 2 TDI's per week. Have a
great weekend.
Cutting the Cable image originally uploaded by George Reilly [4]
Technorati: Information
Security [5], CSO [6],
Security
Mike [7], Internet
Security [8]
[9]The Pragmatic CSO: Available Now! Read the Intro and Get "5 Tips to be a Better CSO" www.pragmaticcso.com [10] |
Get Your Special Report: 6 Easy Steps to Protect Your Identity and get access to Security Mike's Portal today www.securitymike.com [11] [12] |
Top Security News
ITIL [13]
is, but go with me here) is gaining steam because the complexity of
today's IT environment requires an abstraction to help get our arms
around it. Well, security is in the same boat and I've been hearing
folks talk about applying ITIL practices to security for at least 18
months. Now it seems some folks are actually doing
it, according to this NetworkWorld coverage. [14] Personally, I
don't care where the program/framework/processes, etc. come from. As
long as it's focused on solving on protecting the most important assets
of the organization and structured in a way to ensure you can
communicate your achievements, I'm all for it.
Link to this [14]
Opera deciding that complaining to the EU [15]
was actually a better idea than competing in the market. Now if IE
still had 97% market share, they may have a point. But with Firefox
continuing to grow and make inroads, Opera just seems like they are
suing because they can't compete. Basically it seems their entire
intention is to figure out a way to be distributed with the base OS.
Here's another idea, actually go to the PC makers and see if they are
interested in bundling your app. Oh yeah, a little detail... customers
don't want it. As evidenced by the special, Windows without Media
Player version that was a result of Real Networks suing Microsoft in
Europe, or something like that. I'm pretty sure that everyone is free
to load software onto their devices and to use alternative technologies
to the stuff that Microsoft bundles in. How many of you are using
Windows Mail? Right, you can load up whatever is the standard for your
companies email client. But I guess the mobile browser game is OK
because it can fund Hail Mary's like this.
Link to this [15]
"New
and Built in security technologies could soon make the PC safer than ever" [16]
is a welcome idea. But then he goes on to talk about TPM. Right the
Trusted Platform Module. What problem does having an on-board
encryption chip solve again? Oh yeah, what about all the software that
would be needed to use it in practice (I spent $30 million of other
people's money in the late 90's to prove that if ANYONE has to do
ANYTHING to make encryption work - they won't)? What about the fact
that the data and user's identity is then married to the device. I know
I use 3 devices very regularly, so that won't work for me. Then he goes
on to talk about anti-bot technology and a sort of LoJack for your PC.
But the close is the killer: "When
these features are coupled with Vista SP1 and an adequate biometric
authentication system, enterprises should be able to provide an
unprecedented level of data security." An "unprecedented
level of data security," by securing a laptop? There seems to be a
disconnect about what data security is. I guess when all you know is a
PC, everything looks like a laptop.
Link to this [16]
The Laundry List
- What's next OysterNAC? Sourcefire's plan to make customers pay for ClamAV support is to add DLP. Good luck with that. - Sourcefire release [17]
- nCipher shops at the NeoScale fire sale. Amazing what $2 million will buy you nowadays. - nCipher release [18]
- What is Security Risk Management again? I'm not sure, but you can now get it as SaaS from TraceSecurity. Remember the good old days when companies would actually try to create new categories, as opposed to everyone jumping into the same poorly defined buckets? - TraceSecurity release [19]
- If at first you don't succeed...try try again. Marc Maiffret suddenly sees and decides to leave eEye to start another venture. Actually he's been gone since September, but no one seemed to realize he was missing. - NetworkWorld coverage [20]
Top Blog Postings
http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/security/adventures/archives/security-must-have-a-seat-at-the-table-21147 [21]
Link
to this [21]
http://www.matasano.com/log/1002/the-wikipedia-advertising-vulnerability-and-how-not-to-mess-it-up/ [22]
Link
to this [22]
http://securosis.com/2007/12/10/data-and-application-security-will-drive-most-security-growth-for-the-next-3-5-years/ [23]
Link
to this [23]
http://sm-blog.securitymike.com [24]
Check out the
latest on
the Security Incite blog
http://blog.securityincite.com/ [25]
Read the
most recent Daily
Incite
http://securityincite.com/security-incite-rants/daily-incite [25]
[9]
[12]